On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:21:02AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > It is still a form of a rolling release though, just one with branches. I > think it was actually clear to most of the readers that CentOS Stream is not > Rawhide directly (because then it would be Rawhide, not CentOS Stream), but > that CentOS Stream 8 is the RHEL 8 branch that was branched from Rawhide at > some point early in RHEL 8 development and that of course no longer tracks > Rawhide, but only gets what is intended to land in RHEL 8 at some point. (At > least to me, this was always clear.)
I'm glad to hear it, because it definitely was not clear to many, and I was starting to feel like "many" might be "everyone". :) > But even though each CentOS Stream "release" is a stable branch of > Rawhide, it still in many ways behaves like Rawhide or another rolling > release rather than like a release. Here in Fedora, we are used to getting > lots of updates to packages, so we may be fine with such a rolling branch > (though from the description, I would expect CentOS Stream to be more like > Fedora updates- testing than like Fedora stable updates, or is there > already strict RHEL QA before something reaches even CentOS Stream?), but There is already RHEL QA before it reaches Stream. I can't honestly speak to how strict it is, and of course people's standards for that will vary. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
