Emmanuel Seyman <emman...@seyman.fr> writes: >> However, I'm not stuck on that one and it's probably not useful to stay >> stuck on it if there's not enough support to do it. So, let's find a >> different solution. > > What exactly do you want to do with this list of lightly-maintained > packages?
I have been wondering this myself: what advantage will this bring, besides a bit more peace of mind for the maintainer? I'd also like to point out that we actually have a concept for lightly maintained packages that cannot reach end users: modularity. I know its not popular, but it would be an option for this. However, I wouldn't be a fan if it being used like this. Cheers, Dan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
