On Thu, Nov 12, 2020, 4:15 PM Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:07:29AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > I still believe that this concept is inherently incompatible with the > idea > > of a cooperative community distribution, and that bringing it up again > and > > again with minimally changed wording is not a constructive thing to do. > > > > I can see why RHEL has a business case for having such "second-class > > citizen" packages, but this is not how Fedora works or should work. > > Well, except, it clearly *does* work that way. We have many > lightly-maintained packages in practice. I think it's better to label them > as such and find positive ways to encourage the collaboration I think we > all > agree is best, rather than the current state where we basically just > pretend > that everything is maintained with high attention. > I'm not sure anyone's pretending. In my experience distros that spilt up into many repos add complexity (and mistakes) on the releng side and a poor UX for the users. If we had labels in Pagure for the packages that you consider to be troublesome, would that help? - Ken > >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
