On Wed, Oct 21, 2020, 07:03 Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote:

> * Fabio Valentini:
>
> > Looks like the most recent glibc update in rawhide broke some stuff,
> > including running dnf:
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 57, in <module>
> >     from dnf.cli import main
> >   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/__init__.py", line 30, in
> <module>
> >     import dnf.base
> >   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 29, in
> <module>
> >     import libdnf.transaction
> >   File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/libdnf/__init__.py", line
> > 12, in <module>
> >     from . import conf
> >   File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/libdnf/conf.py", line 13, in
> <module>
> >     from . import _conf
> > ImportError: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0: undefined symbol: lstat64,
> > version GLIBC_2.33
> >
> > dnf not working is clearly bad because it will prevent users who get
> > the broken glibc update from fixing things, right?
>
> I'm pretty sure this is the result of *not* updating glibc.  Did you
> attempt a partial upgrade of rawhide, restricting the package set during
> an update?
>
> I cannot reproduce this: In the current compose and buildroot,
> libglib-2.0.so.0 and libc.so.6 are consistent.
>

No, this error came up while running fedora-review. I'm pretty sure it only
ever installs things to the mock chroot and doesn't do partial upgrades.

Fabio


> Thanks,
> Florian
> --
> Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
> Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
> Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael
> O'Neill
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to