My apologies, of course we are aiming to package the unversioned symbolic links to the "real" libraries to *-devel package. I thought it was clear from the beginning.
Why should we hack the soversion ? There are no changes to the soname or ABI compatibility coming, we want to just package the unversioned symbolic links to the "real" libraries to *-devel package. On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 1:14 PM Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Adding my $0.02 here... > > Since they are real libraries, they don't belong in a -devel package, the > intent is to package the unversioned symbolic links to the "real" > libraries. A end user package should never require a -devel package to run. > > One option would be to hack in a soversion to the build process. I did > this for many years with openCOLLADA, and used either > abi-compliance-checker or abipkgdiff to determine when a soversion bump was > required. > > Thanks, > Richard > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
