On Wed, Sep 30, 2020, at 4:17 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:58 pm, Petr Menšík <pemen...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > Shouldn't it change resolv.conf only in case NM is active AND > > resolv.conf is generated by Network Manager? > > Correct, that's indeed what it does. (Since Zbigniew changed it > yesterday. Previously, it did not check if NM is active.)
I know this is already an epic thread but, just a FYI: This type of thing will completely not work on an rpm-ostree based system because the %post is run server side. It can't compute anything based on per-user data (and that's *also* true even when doing client side layering - the `/etc` that the `%post` script sees is the defaults, not anything a user has customized). In general, any upgrade logic that needs to take into account user configuration needs to be a systemd unit, not a `%post`. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
