On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:18 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 30. 09. 20 21:12, Tony Asleson wrote: > > On 9/30/20 1:05 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > >> Looks like your update briefly made it stable, but then the older build > >> (pywbem-1.0.1-1.fc33) was tagged back over the new one > >> (pywbem-0.14.6-6.fc33): > >> > >> $ koji list-history --tag f33 --package pywbem > >> Tue Feb 11 18:46:20 2020 package owner releng set for pywbem in f33 by > >> mohanboddu [still active] > >> Tue Feb 11 18:46:20 2020 package list entry created: pywbem in f33 by > >> mohanboddu [still active] > >> Tue Feb 11 19:20:52 2020 pywbem-0.14.6-2.fc32 tagged into f33 by > mohanboddu > >> Fri May 29 14:27:13 2020 pywbem-0.14.6-3.fc33 tagged into f33 by autopen > >> Sat Aug 1 20:48:49 2020 pywbem-0.14.6-4.fc33 tagged into f33 by > mohanboddu > >> [still active] > >> Mon Aug 10 07:14:46 2020 pywbem-1.0.1-1.fc33 tagged into f33 by bodhi > >> Tue Aug 11 17:38:36 2020 pywbem-0.14.6-2.fc32 untagged from f33 by oscar > >> Fri Sep 25 18:23:13 2020 pywbem-0.14.6-6.fc33 tagged into f33 by bodhi > >> [still active] > >> Sat Sep 26 20:14:34 2020 pywbem-1.0.1-1.fc33 re-tagged into f33 by kevin > >> Sat Sep 26 20:21:02 2020 pywbem-0.14.6-3.fc33 untagged from f33 by oscar > >> > >> The older build was tagged over the new one because Kevin ran a fixup > >> script to find packages where Bodhi accidentally pushed an older > version on > >> top of a new one (it's a long standing Bodhi issue during freezes). Your > >> build was caught in the fixup. > >> > >> However, before you go and ask releng to undo this, I believe what they > did > >> was actually correct. The EVR of a package should not go backwards like > you > >> pushed an older build there. Instead, you need to bump Epoch to 1 (in > both > >> F33 and master) and then do new builds and submit that to bodhi. This > >> should make the downgrade correctly happen. > >> > > > > I specifically asked about this: > > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MAIHXM4CSZPPTHIB42AMUSWZTUFQESZU/ > > > > and was told to not bump the epoch and that all would be fine if I got > > this done before final freeze, which is what I'm trying to do. > > > > So what's the correct answer, because I'm running out of time? > > In my opinion, you should ask releng to undo this. > > But in case such fixups are done repeatedly (I assume they don't), bumping > the > epoch might be a way to prevent it. > > Note that I've advised not to bump the epoch, because there was no upgrade > path > issue at all (the package with higher EVR was not installable). > Ahh, sure, if the previous package was uninstallable then it should be fine to not use epoch. So two options here: a) file a releng ticket ( https://pagure.io/releng/issues) and ask them to re-tag the other build, or b) just bump release and rebuild and submit it to bodhi once more. -- Kalev
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
