> Hi Zbyszek, > Would it make sense to do the same for systemd-resolved ? > Sounds like it has similar impact/scope wrt coreos.
Yes please, I would like this for Edge/IoT too (both network/resolved) as there are use cases there where we'd like not to ship these too. Peter > On Wed, 2020-09-30 at 16:26 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > the systemd package is getting a systemd-networkd subpackage split out > > that will contain systemd-networkd, networkctl, and the associated data > > files. > > This was requested by coreos maintainers: NetworkManager is used and > > skipping > > systemd-networkd allows the installation footprint and potential user > > confusion > > to be reduced a bit. (By 1.6 MB and an unknown amount, respectively.) > > > > Appropriate Obsoletes are added on both the main package and the new > > systemd-networkd subpackage, so the systemd-networkd subpackage should > > be installed on upgrades. In addition, the new subpackage has Recommends > > from > > the main package, so it will be installed in normal installations. The split > > affects installations with --setopt=install_weak_deps=False. Please make > > sure > > to pull in systemd-networkd.rpm independently if needed. Also note that > > systemd-networkd.service was preset as *disabled* in Fedora, which means > > that > > unless it was enabled by the user, the removal of systemd-networkd wouldn't > > have an effect. > > > > In addition, two more new subpackages are created: > > systemd-standalone-sysusers > > and systemd-standalone-tmpfiles, with custom-linked systemd-sysusers and > > systemd-tmpfiles binaries. They packages are 170kB and 260kB and pull in > > much > > less dependencies compared to the normal systemd package (only glibc, > > libselinux, > > and libacl). The goal here is to be able to use those packages in limited > > environments where systemd itself is not necessary. > > > > The main systemd systemd package Obsoletes the -standalone- packages, so it > > should smoothly replace them whenever it is pulled in. > > > > This change was done in systemd-246.6-2.fc34 in rawhide right now. (There > > are > > some cleanups to move more files to the -networkd subpackage in the works > > for > > 246.6-3.fc34). Please give this a spin and report any issues. > > > > The plan is to also do this split for F33 if no issues are noted in rawhide. > > > > Zbyszek > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > -- > Simo Sorce > RHEL Crypto Team > Red Hat, Inc > > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
