On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 13:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:44:13AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > After reading https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8967, I really > > don't think that systemd-resolved's benefits outweigh its harms as a > > default resolver for Fedora. If someone wants to write a > > libfriendlydnsresolver and encourage/patch programs to use it instead of > > using glibc's resolver or reading resolv.conf, then that could be debated > > on its merits. But the actual contents of /etc/resolv.conf should follow > > the relevant standards, and systemd-resolved does not. > > > > Perhaps systemd-resolved could change its mind and decide to comply with > > all relevant standards. But until then, it seems inappropriate to me for > > it to be the default in Fedora. > > Pfff, now I'm confused. Here is a case where systemd-resolved implements > the > standard, and some people were unhappy because they were relying on sloppy > implementations which don't follow the RFC. Nevertheless, we added an > opt-in > switch to make this work. (Since this feature mostly matters in "special" > setups like k8s, where you need to do a lot of local setup anyway, > requiring > a one-line option seems to be reasonable). > Hey for those of us in the peanuts gallery watching this play out.. could each of you point out which standards and RFC you are complying too. There are a lot of ones and funny enough.. they don't all agree with each other at times. -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
