On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:35:26 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> So, was this compiled by GCC or clang?

Fedora Koji package:
        lldb-debuginfo-11.0.0-0.2.rc3.fc34.x86_64

GNU GIMPLE 10.2.1 20200916 (Red Hat 10.2.1-4) -m64 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 
-g -g -g -O2 -O2 -O2 -O2 -fno-openmp -fno-openacc -fcf-protection=none 
-ffat-lto-objects -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong 
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fPIC -ffunction-sections 
-fdata-sections -fltrans -fplugin=annobin


> A way out of this could be either to use comdat .debug_info etc. sections
> (but that would result in quite large increase of *.o file sizes), or let
> the linker or a tool like DWZ discard or simplify such DIEs.
> I don't see how could you see at compile time that the linker will not
> choose the particular copy.

Another option is to use clang which should have such optimization implemented
soon:
        https://whova.com/embedded/session/llvm_202010/1193947/


Jan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to