On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:08:46AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:07 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:09:42PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > I'm annoyed in general that we still have problems like this, and I'm
> > > even more annoyed that I basically have no way to even test or deal
> > > with these things. We *still* do not have packager test machines, so I
> > > can't even figure out how to craft a workaround if there is one (and I
> > > suspect one is possible).
> >
> > We do: 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers.
> > There's one ppc64le on that list.
> >
> 
> They were all down, last I checked a month ago. But it seems like the
> ppc64le one is back online now. :)

The aarch64/armv7 ones are still down, but we got a vm elsewhere for ppc64le. 
The x86_64 ones should all be up and working. 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to