On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:51:46PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > Sooooo: RH Java packagers, what if you build these packages as non-modular > (maybe using some scripting to make it happen at the same time as modular > builds?) and add a readme explaining their maintenance state?
Do you mean literally a README file under /usr/share/doc/${PACAKGE}/
directory? That won't work, because nobody looks there.
Either the package should be moved into a separate repository that an end user
have to explicitly enable and later can inspect an origin of the package with
"dnf info $PACKAGE", or the package should not be distributed at all. Pungi
tool that produces the distribution composes supports it. It's only a matter
of configuration.
(Or we can invent a new RPM tag for a support level of the package.)
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
