On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 07:55:57PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 21. 08. 20 10:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > Josh listed some of the key reasons behind default streams: that > > > enterprise customers don't like to learn new commands. So default > > > streams allowed us to package content with shorter-than-RHEL-lifetime > > > and still `yum install foo` would install something the customer could > > > use. > > I guess that "shorter-than-RHEL-lifetime" is the big differentiator, i.e. > > normal rpms cannot be yanked from the distribution, but a module can be. > > Actually AFAIK modules shipped at GA cannot be yanked from the distribution > either. Certainly not in Fedora. > Modules are not removed from RHEL repositories either. The difference is that in RHEL they stop being supported. That's something what Fedora has not yet experienced.
Bedides EPEL. I think that packages in EPEL are sometimes rebased to incompatible versions and what happen with the unneded dependencies of the old versions is not clear to me. I think they are marked as a dead package in dist-git and blocked from Koji. But do they disappear from the repository? If the stable repository is based on Koji blocked status, then then should the removed. -- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
