On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 16:28:47 +0200
Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> - autoreconf fails because %build needs a newer shell (protobuf):
> 
> /usr/bin/autoconf: This script requires a shell more modern than all
> /usr/bin/autoconf: the shells that I found on your system.
> /usr/bin/autoconf: Please tell bug-autoc...@gnu.org about your system,
> /usr/bin/autoconf: including any error possibly output before this
> /usr/bin/autoconf: message. Then install a modern shell, or manually
> run /usr/bin/autoconf: the script under such a shell if you do have
> one. autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1
> 
> - shell not executing stuff in backticks `command foo` but returns
> empty string (tonto):
>     `build-classpath foo` # this doesn't work?
> 
> 
> I'm getting the sinking feeling that RPM scriptlets are broken? Do
> they get run in the wrong shell? sh instead of bash maybe?
> 
> I'm grasping at straws here, but all those build failures are starting
> to be really disruptive to the work that I'm actually trying to do ...

I had an issue with a configure script wanting a more modern shell. I
tried running mock with --isolation-simple and it stopped complaining.
Maybe that would help you too?

Paul.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to