On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:42 PM Qiyu Yan <yanq...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have some problem with rpmdev-bumpspec recently.
>
> In the latest version of rpmdevtools, rpmdev-bumpspec has changed to
> use time+date in the changelog it generates[1], while the packaging
> guidelines have not been updated accordingly[2], should the guideline
> be updated to the rpmdev-bumpspec change?
>
> I am packaging fcitx5 using forge macros, and upstream have never
> tagged a version, in this case, I am packaging like this [3] (The
> snapshot dates and git short commit hashesin changelog is manually
> added). With this spec file, I noticed that when I try to use
> rpmdev-bumpspec to generate a changelog, it will give things like this
> [4].
>
> You can see that, in case of using forge, rpmdev-bumpspec can't
> include either snapshot dates nor git short commit hashes, will this
> be fine (and we can ignore the warning from rpmlint when ran on the
> built packages, and start the review process) or I should always
> manually include snapshot dates and git commit hashes in the
> changelog. Or I should wait for this change [5] to be done and ignore
> all changelog things? (and submit for review then?)
>
> Thanks.

You're not wrong, rpmdev-bumpspec is not completely compatible with
the forge macros, especially in the snapshot packaging case (because
the forge macros mess with the value of %dist, as mentioned in the
other response).

While rpmdev-bump will produce changelog entries with "wrong" (or
incomplete) EVR information, SRPM and RPM builds will have the correct
Release set, so it's not a "big deal". For my packages that suffer
from this (e.g. some Go packages that internally use the forge
macros), I tend to manually "fix" the version-release in the changelog
entries after running rpmdev-bumpspec.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to