On Wednesday, August 12, 2020 3:43:24 PM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 8/12/20 12:06 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday, August 12, 2020 11:27:37 AM MST Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > 
> >> mem avail:   337 of 15887 MiB ( 2.13%), swap free:    0 of 4095 MiB (
> >> 0.00%)
> > > low memory! at or below SIGTERM limits: mem  2.52%, swap 10.00%
> >> sending SIGTERM to process 1898342 uid 1000 "zoom": badness 36, VmRSS
> >> 721
> >> MiB
> >> process exited after 0.0 seconds
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> So.... I wonder if is advisable using EarlyOOM + ZRAM Only, what do you
> >> think?
> >> Thanks in advance!
> > 
> > 
> > Please keep this in mind going forward, and take a moment to consider
> > enabling EarlyOOM in Fedora. As it turns out, EarlyOOM does exactly what
> > it says it does: It kills your programs when you've still got plenty of
> > free memory.
> 
> Where do you see any evidence of "plenty of free memory".  There was 
> nothing left.  Maybe there is a bug in the reporting, but it definitely 
> wasn't doing what you say it was.

There was over 300 MiB of memory available. That's more than a quarter of a 
gigabyte. That's a ton of RAM. There was no *swap* left.

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to