Hi Jakub, On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 19:10 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 06:33:45PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Yes, I think we have a winner! > > gas generates a tiny bit of debuginfo even if you don't supply -g. > > > > But... in 2.35 you can give the DWARF level you want. > > The problem with not supplying -g (or --gdwarf-[VERSION]) is that the > > dwarf_level is never set! And then gas will happily create an > > .debug_info section with DWARF CUs that have a version of zero (!). > > > > This, defaulting to version 4. Fixes it for me: > > Older as versions emitted DWARF 2, so wouldn't that be a better default > and let gcc pass --gdwarf-? to as if it detects support at compile time > depending on gcc's default dwarf version or -gdwarf-N option?
Defaulting to dwarf_level = 2 in the patch should also work. But I think it is high time we defaulted all tools to DWARF version 4 these days. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
