Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> LGPL has other implications towards proprietary software, and that's
> what the authors specifically want to protect, so that's a hard line.
>
> Wouldn't the Classpath Exception [1] be appropriate here? This
> wouldn't require the interpretation of a new legal text.
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/GPL_Classpath_Exception
The Classpath Exception is at least as permissive as the LGPL, so if upstram
is not OK with the LGPL, they will not be OK with the Classpath Exception
either (at least they should not, rationally).
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
