On Fr, 10.07.20 06:50, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 6:45 AM Marek Suchánek <msuch...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > I haven't seen any mention of Silverblue in the Btrfs discussions. Will > > Silverblue also switch to Btrfs if the change is approved? > > > > I've tested installing Silverblue 32 and Rawhide with the default Btrfs > > partitioning suggested by Anaconda, and in both cases the system failed to > > boot after installation. It couldn't mount the Btrfs subvolumes. > > > > Is that a known issue or should I report it as a bug? > > > > The expectation is that Silverblue will follow along with Workstation, > yes. We do know about the bug and have a fix proposed to Anaconda: > https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/2720
Instead of passing this in each time on the kernel cmdline, maybe just use "btrfs subvol set-default" to se the default subvolume to mount, after mkfs. That makes things a lot more robust, as btrfs will then just work like any other fs even if you insert the root subvol in between like anaconda apparently does. I think there's big value in allowing short kernel cmdlines that are as similar as possible everywhere, instead of blowing it up with different switches for every single case. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
