On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 11:50 AM Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> wrote: > > Upon reading the SwapOnZRAM feature proposal, I see it is advocating > allocating 50% of ram for swap. I'd like folks to consider and evaluate how > this impacts earlyoom. It effectively makes the earlyoom memory threshold > double (right?). If so, at least think about lowering 4 to (2 or 3), since > that will make earlyoom's behavior closer to before swaponzram was > introduced. > No objections from me as KDE EarlyOOM change owner. My main concern is that if someone disables SwapOnZRAM, the effective default EarlyOOM threshold changes. I don't think there's any easy way to handle that, but it's an effect we should explicitly take into account.
With my FPgM hat on, I would consider this to be a part of the Swap on ZRAM proposal, which has been approved by FESCo and so wouldn't require its own change proposal. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
