El mar., 30 jun. 2020 a las 10:26, Ben Cotton (<bcot...@redhat.com>) escribió:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KDEEarlyOOM > > == Summary == > As [[Changes/EnableEarlyoom|Fedora Workstation did in F32]], install > earlyoom package, and enable it by default. If both RAM and swap go below > 10% free, earlyoom issues SIGTERM to the process with the largest > oom_score. If both RAM and swap go below 5% free, earlyoom issues SIGKILL > to the process with the largest oom_score. The idea is to recover from out > of memory situations sooner, rather than the typical complete system hang > in which the user has no other choice but to force power off. > > == Owner == > * Name: [[User:bcotton|Ben Cotton]] > * Email: bcot...@redhat.com > > == Detailed Description == > Shamelessly copied from Workstation, which did it in the last release: > > Certain workloads have heavy memory demands, quickly consume all of RAM, > and start to heavily page out to swap. (Heavy paging, is often called "swap > thrashing" for added descriptive effect, probably because it's noticeable > and annoying). Incidental swap usage is a good thing, it frees up memory > for active pages used by a process. Heavy swap usage quickly leads to a > very negative UX, because it's slow, even on modern SSDs. Due to installer > defaults, the swap partition is made the same size as available memory (at > install time), which can be huge. This just extends swap thrashing time. > > On the one hand, we want this resource hungry job to complete. On the > other hand, we want our system to be responsive while that other work is > going on. But once the GUI stutters or even comes to an apparent stand > still (hang), we're really wishing the kernel oom-killer would kick in and > free up memory, so we can start over (maybe using memory or thread limiting > options - which arguably should be more intelligently figured out, and that > too is a work in progress but beyond the scope of this feature). > > However, once in a heavy swap scenario, it's relatively common the system > gets stuck in it, where GUI interactivity is terrible to non-existent, and > also the kernel oom-killer doesn't trigger. From a certain point of view, > this is working as intended. The kernel oom-killer is concerned about > keeping the kernel running. It's not at all concerned about user space > responsiveness. > > Instead of the system becoming completely unresponsive for tens of > minutes, hours or days, this feature expects that an offending process > (determined by oom_score, same as the kernel oom-killer) will be killed off > within seconds or a few minutes. > > == Benefit to Fedora == > > KDE users will be able to take advantage of the benefits Workstation users > got from enabling earlyOOM in Fedora 32: > > * improved user experience by more quickly regaining control over one's > system, rather than having to force power off in low-memory situations > where there's aggressive swapping. Once a system becomes unresponsive, it's > completely reasonable for the user to assume the system is lost, but that > includes high potential for data loss. > * reducing forced poweroff as the main work around will increase data > collection, improving understanding of low memory situations and how to > handle them better > * earlyoom first sends SIGTERM to the chosen process, so it has a chance > of a proper shutdown, unlike the kernel's oom-killer > > == Scope == > * Proposal owners: > ** Modify {{code| > https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/blob/master/f/comps-f33.xml.in}} to > include earlyoom package for in {{code|kde-desktop}} section. > ** Add {{code| > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/blob/master/f/80-kde.preset}} > to include: > <pre> > # enable earlyoom by default on KDE > enable earlyoom.service > </pre> > > * Other developers: None, unless KDE-based Spins/Labs want to opt out > > * Release engineering: N/A > * Policies and guidelines: N/A > * Trademark approval: N/A > > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > earlyoom.service will be enabled on upgrade. An upgraded system should > exhibit the same behaviors as a newly-installed system. > > == How To Test == > * Fedora 31/32 KDE users can test today: > ** {{code|sudo dnf install earlyoom}} > ** {{code|sudo systemctl enable --now earlyoom}} > > And then attempt to cause an out of memory situation. Examples: > ** {{code|tail /dev/zero}} > ** https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/8/4/15 > > == User Experience == > earlyoom sends SIGTERM to processes based on oom_score when both memory > and swap have less than 10% free and SIGKILL when below 5%. > > == Dependencies == > None > > == Contingency Plan == > > * Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) Owner reverts > changes > * Contingency deadline: Final freeze > * Blocks release? No > > == Documentation == > * {{code|man earlyoom}} > * https://github.com/rfjakob/earlyoom > * https://www.kernel.org/doc/gorman/html/understand/understand016.html > > == Release Notes == > The earlyoom service is now enabled by default in Fedora KDE. > > The earlyoom service monitors system memory usage. If free memory falls > below a set limit, earlyoom terminates an appropriate process to free up > memory. As a result, the system does not become unresponsive for long > periods of time in low-memory situations. > > The following is the default earlyoom configuration: > > * If both RAM and swap go below 10% free, earlyoom sends the SIGTERM > signal to the process with the largest oom_score. > * If both RAM and swap go below 5% free, earlyoom sends the SIGKILL signal > to the process with the largest oom_score. > > For more information, see the earlyoom man page. > > -- > Ben Cotton > He / Him / His > Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream > Red Hat > TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > +1 This would be a genuine improvement for end users! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
