On Wednesday, July 8, 2020 4:16:34 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Monday, July 6, 2020 10:19:31 AM CEST Adam Saleh wrote:
> > Piere (a.k.a Pingou), Nils and me worked on Rpmautospec [1] to solve this
> > problem few months ago.
> > It is a koji plugin as well as CLI tool that makes bumping the release
> > field and generating changelog problem of Koji,
> > instead of package-maintainer. Currently it sits deployed in staging koji,
> > so you can give it a test-drive :-)
> > 
> > We hope we can return to it later this year, to have it deployed in prod
> > koji.
> 
> +1 to what Florian proposes over rpmautospec, though.  I think bumping the
> release flag is the bare minimal technical change that is needed (except that
> bodhi should pre-fill the description by diffs from %changelogs).

Small experiment (few-liner) for copr with "%bid, build system tag":
https://pagure.io/copr/copr/pull-request/1436

Pavel

> I before stated my opinion that I don't like the generated %changelog
> idea.  Fedora git changelog and `rpm --changelog` are two different
> things.  Mixing them up will bring more costs than savings (fixing
> mistakes in git commit messages retrospectively).  Or in other extreme the
> ugly `rpm --changelog` output (people don't care they mistakenly provided
> broken git commit message).
> 
> I think that it would be just enough to allow people to stop producing
> `rpm --changelog`s if they think that it so awful amount of work (both
> better than more expensive %changelog variant, or ugly variant).  Let's
> allow packagers to specify something like:
> 
>     %changelog
>     * there's no package metadata in changelog
> 
> Or in the worst case, automatize:
> 
>     * there's no package metadata in changelog
>     - check %_pkgdocdir/fedora-git-changelog file
> 
> I'm not saying that we can not see every proposed approach in action as
> opt-in.  But, IMVHO, we are wasting to much efforts time here that could
> be spent on our content served to our users instead (== I mean the overall
> %changelog quality).
> 
> Pavel
> 
> > [1] https://docs.pagure.org/Fedora-Infra.rpmautospec/principle.html
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:22 AM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > * Björn Persson:
> > >
> > > > The macro could be defined like this for example:
> > > >
> > > >   %buildtag .%(date +%%s)
> > >
> > > Using time for synchronization is always a bit iffy.
> > >
> > > > It would be used in each spec like this:
> > > >
> > > >   Release: 1%{?dist}%{?buildtag}
> > >
> > > We could put the Koji task ID directly into the %dist tag.  We know that
> > > this works in principle.  If we are worried that the number gets too
> > > large, we could subtract the current task ID at the time the fcNN part
> > > of the %dist tag changes.
> > >
> > > The %dist tag is not recorded in the changelog by most packages, so the
> > > changelog does not need changing.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Florian
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives:
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > >
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 



_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to