El vie., 5 jun. 2020 a las 16:10, John M. Harris Jr (<joh...@splentity.com>) escribió:
> On Friday, June 5, 2020 12:03:03 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 11:47 AM John M. Harris Jr <joh...@splentity.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, June 4, 2020 11:54:37 PM MST Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Also -1 to adding something to the core system that is written in a > > > > language for which we do not even have dynamic linking support. Or > > > > even real static linking support, as opposed to packaging libraries > as > > > > source code.> > > > > > Kevin Kofler > > > > > > > > > > > > Agreed. Besides, GNOME already has this enabled, right? It's definitely > > > not right for servers, as I brought up the last time this was thrown > > > around. > > > > In discussions with both cloud and server folks, their use cases often > > do not even create disk-based swap at all. A small swap-on-zram > > provides all the benefits of inactive anonymous page eviction, > > including reducing reclaim of file pages, without the black hole > > performance problems of swap-on-drive. > > > > So yes it's well suited for these cases and the proposal does include > > them. If they wish to be left out, that's up to those working groups. > > It's possible to make sure /etc/systemd/zram-generator is not present. > > That doesn't seem to reflect reality. If you download the Server image > right > now, and go with its automatic partitioning scheme generation, it'll give > you > a swap partition on LVM. This is correct for most servers, not necessarily > the > LVM part, but having swap on disk. > > It really seems like this is wrong for most of Fedora, but that individual > parts, such as Fedora GNOME or IoT, should be left to make the decision > for > themselves, without affecting the rest. > > -- > John M. Harris, Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > At https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwapOnZRAM#Why_systemd_zram-generator.3F it says: "Do not create swap partition/LV with default installations." I don't understand if it is a description or a prescription :)I mean, can coexist swap partition/LV and zram? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
