Le vendredi 03 juillet 2020 à 11:09 -0700, PGNet Dev a écrit :
> 
>       %define _build_timestamp %( date +%Y%m%d_%H%M%S )
> 

You’re hitting rpm macro expansion and the fact someone added %S as
alias to%SOURCE in recent rpm versions (source management is an unholly
mess in original rpm and people keep bolting new workarounds over old
workarounds insteak of fixing it once and for all. The original lua
integration in rpm was justified by the needs of the %sources macro,
that’s not an accident).

It is unsafe to use % for anything except rpm macro calls in a spec
file, unless you escape it with % first.

As for date, you’ll be generally better using a standard like --iso-
8601 or --rfc-3339, even if that means a lua gsub pass to replace
characters rpm does not like, than inventing your own. And don’t forget
the -u flag or you’ll have surprises as soon as you start working with
people not in your own timezone.

Reagrds,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to