On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 1:18 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:

> > So all those people are happy with vi? IMHO an argument for changing
> > this would be that a lot of people are already changing EDITOR to nano,
> > so it makes sense to make it a default. If this is actually not the
> > case it is not very convincing to change this.
>
> I think people may not be happy with something, but if it's not trivial to
> change
> (and knowing that EDITOR may be set in bash configuration, but the
> variable has to be exported, and then you need to reload the shell config
> because
> the change does not take effect immediately is not trivial), they will
> continue to use the default as long as they are able to get by.
>

Or they just try Fedora and immediately mark it as a distro not for them.
Because when they do "git commit" in Ubuntu, it opens up a reasonably user
friendly editor (nano). When they do it in Fedora, it opens up a screen
they don't even know how to exit (vi). If I were a new user to Linux, it
would be clear to me which distribution is for me and which one is
definitely not.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to