On Thursday, July 2, 2020 4:06:55 PM MST Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 12:49 AM John M. Harris Jr <joh...@splentity.com> > > None of the linked blockers are core packages, and some of them are > > outright not designed to work on anything other than 64 bit. I really > > don't understand how you can see that as justification. > > Even though both trackers still receive reports, many packagers just > stopped bothering with i686, because there was little response and > there were long-lasting breakages in rawhide. A distro arch is more > than the kernel; what good is having a 32-bit kernel and nothing to > run on it? See how many i686 bugs are closed as WONTFIX or > INSUFFICIENT_DATA.
There's more to core packages than just the kernel. There were no bugs in the default install of Fedora Server or Fedora KDE Spin or GNOME Spin. -- John M. Harris, Jr. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
