On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 18:54, Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 01. 07. 20 18:33, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 11:28 am, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> 
> > wrote:
> >> I have not much opinion on whether we should use this vs. nano.
> >
> > Actually, playing with it for an extra three minutes... it's *really* nice.
> >
> > I know micro is not nearly as standard or popular as nano, but... this is 
> > worth
> > serious additional consideration.
>
> I love micro. The problematic part is it's rather big.
>
> nano: 670 k
> micro: 4.7 M
>
> (sizes from repoquery --info)

To be fair, we should add ncurses-libs and file-libs as dependencies:
330 k + 570 k = 900 k more. But yes, micro is still bigger, as its
name suggests. :)

> BTW My keyboard bindings for micro that resemble a standard (modern) terminal
> session more: https://gist.github.com/hroncok/f7bc01080e3b72320b858c437af92151

That's very useful, thanks!

-- 
Iñaki Úcar
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to