Because was bitten by this and there is not clear guideline, I have tried to draft something here:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/988 Vít Dne 03. 05. 18 v 12:10 Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a): > In libvirt we recently deleted a driver for the legacy Xen toolstack. > > This was shipped in a libvirt-daemon-driver-xen RPM. > > I am able to add an "Obsoletes: libvirt-daemon-driver-xen < 4.3.0" > line to the libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl RPM, which gives clean > upgrade path for users. > > If they have the libvirt-daemon-driver-xen-debuginfo RPM installed > though that still breaks the upgrade. > > How can I get the auto-generated libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl-debuginfo > RPM to have an "Obsoletes: libvirt-daemon-driver-xen-debuginfo < 4.3.0" > statement ? It seems impossible, meaning users with debuginfo have a > broken upgrade path. An unfortunate consequence of switching to seprate > -debuginfo per sub-RPM. > > Regards, > Daniel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
