On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 08:24:34PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2020-05-19 at 18:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > The most suspicious change between the two build envs that I can see is > > openssl. GOOD has openssl-1.1.1g-1.fc33.x86_64 , and BAD has > > openssl-1.1.1g-2.fc33.x86_64 . I'm gonna try doing an openssl build > > with the patch from -2 reverted and see where that gets us. > > OK, I think that did the trick. nbdkit's x86_64 build succeeded this > time, and the log shows no systemctl crashes: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7666/44717666/root.log > > I'll file a bug on openssl to let tmraz know about the problem. > Hopefully between the two fixes, the next Rawhide may also be fixed...
Nice detective work. You could have save your work with Koschei. <https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/nbdkit> nbdkit history, <https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/8351572> first failure with this test failure on x86_64: supermin: exception: Sys_error("/lib/modules/5.7.0-0.rc5.20200515git1ae7efb38854.1.fc33.x86_64/modules.dep: No such file or directory") with only 5 source packages changed and openssl going from 1:1.1.1g-1.fc33 to 1:1.1.1g-2.fc33 being one of them. -- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
