On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 13:50, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:51 am, Stephen John Smoogen > <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Those pages are needing some love and care as aarch64 should not be > > on it anymore. Currently the primary architectures that Fedora builds > > against are > > > > [smooge@batcave01 32]$ ls -l Workstation/ > > total 12 > > drwxr-xr-x. 3 263 263 4096 2020-04-23 00:09 aarch64/ > > drwxr-xr-x. 3 263 263 4096 2020-04-22 22:27 armhfp/ > > drwxr-xr-x. 3 263 263 4096 2020-04-22 23:08 x86_64/ > > So we used to distinguish between primary and secondary architectures > in that package maintainers were responsible for primary architectures > and architecture teams were responsible for secondary architectures. > > Now, all architectures are built on koji and all builds have to > succeed. So we're forced to care about ppc64le and s390x whether you > call them "primary" or not. Is it still a useful distinction to have? > > > The workstation image for armhfp is stored in > > > > [smooge@batcave01 releases]$ ls -1 > > 32/Workstation/armhfp/images/Fedora-Workstation-* > > 32/Workstation/armhfp/images/Fedora-Workstation-32-1.6-armhfp-CHECKSUM > > 32/Workstation/armhfp/images/Fedora-Workstation-armhfp-32-1.6-sda.raw.xz > > OK, that's extremely confusing. I assumed ARM was no longer supported > because it's not found on alt.fedoraproject.org. I'm not sure if > removing architectures from there is a good idea. Anyway, OK then, I > guess I still have to care about it. :) > > You keep thinking that ARM is a secondary architecture and it would be on alt.fedoraproject.org. ARM is a primary architecture and so would NOT show up on alt. ARM has been a primary architecture for many releases so this isn't new. > Why do we call it armv7hl on koji but armhfp for the download images? > Consistent terminology would be nice. > > The arm architecture has its own weirdness in the same way that we call x86_32 i386 but we build i686 packages. When x86_64 splits into 48 bit memory path to some larger memory (60 bit I think is discussed) sometime in the future, we will probably still call it x86_64 but build x86_64b packages. The world of building for hardware is messy.. > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
