On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 12:39:04PM -0400, Dan Book wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 12:05 PM Scott Talbert <s...@techie.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 8 May 2020, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >
> > >> That is kind of what I figured.  BTW, I used the GUI method to upgrade.
> > >
> > > Yeah me too. And my fedora-obsolete-packages is also gone.
> > >
> > > It cannot be installed, either. I wonder: am I misunderstanding how this
> > is
> > > supposed to work? Or has something improperly obsoleted it?
> >
> > Sounds like it is new expected behavior of dnf:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827398
> 
> 
> The default clean_requirements_on_remove is still something I turn off
> immediately on any system's dnf.conf. It's come up before[1] that this
> could be presented way better in the dnf UI, it's very confusing.

No, this is not related to clean_requirements_on_remove. As mentioned
upthread, fedora-obsolete-packages now does its job without being installed.

Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to