On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:41 PM Petr Pisar <ppi...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 12:41:06PM +0200, Tomas Tomecek wrote: > > Petr, I should have probably stressed that our target is Fedora (or > > even all Red Hat operating systems). Yes, there are hundreds of > > distributions and we cannot solve their problems. We are open for > > collaboration though - we cannot drive changes in distributions which > > we don't know or use. > > > If you only target Fedora, then it means that the same amount of Fedora > maintainers will maintain twofold amount of repositories. Does it indeed save > work? What's the benefit of maintaining more repositories?
My personal expectation here would be that if I enabled source-git for my packages, I wouldn't want to touch dist-git and only work in the source-git repos. Yes, there would still be changes coming to dist-git, and I'd inspect those from source-git. I'd even ask contributors to use source-git for PR contributions if possible. > Therefore I assumed you had targeted more distribution to share and > externilize the maintenance. > > Maybe my problem is that I don't buy your argument that if Fedora dist-git > looks as Github, then Fedora will attract new packagers. As I said, it's a prototype and we'll see. Thanks for your feedback, Tomas _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
