On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:55 AM Guido Aulisi <guido.aul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 26/04/2020 alle 18.13 +0100, Aoife Moloney ha scritto: > > # CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26 > > --- > > title: CPE Weekly status email > > tags: CPE Weekly, email > > --- > > Hello, > > ... snip > > > > ## GitForge Updates > > * We will be tracking our progress here > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Git_forge_update > > * Please be aware this does not contain any new information, as we > > don't have any to share yet. > > * However once we have more information for you, we will be posting > > it > > to the above link, and with the URL in the weekly emails for quick > > access. > > * We are currently doing a technical deep-dive with our own team on > > what we need from GitLab > > * We are also still engaging with Fedora Council who are tracking the > > Fedora Communities needs here > > https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/292 > > * And we are looking at ways to engage closer with the CentOS > > community too to share information as and when we have it > > * Public Q&A sessions are still being discussed to allow for open > > conversations in public forums too as we move through this journey, > > so > > thank you for your patience with us. > > So you are doing a technical deep-dive now after choosing Gitlab, not > before deciding? It's a very strange way to take decisions... > We have performed technical analysis at all stages, this is a deeper dive from two perspectives. The first is in respect to the Council and FESCo conversations for the proposed changes to ensure distgit functionality moves through appropriate approval chains and we arrive at a collaborative solution. The second is more technical questions to help arrive at what work CPE needs to undertake and what Gitlab may be able to provide be it tooling / plugin / support and so on. We could not perform the latter until we had arrived at a decision so we are now actively engaged there and a public facing ticket will be available soon for the community to track. > > I'd expect that the entire git forge discussion would start from the > beginning, because of the many mistakes that were made in this process. > > Sorry for my bad english... > > Guido Aulisi > > FAS: tartina > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Leigh Griffin Engineering Manager Red Hat Waterford <https://www.redhat.com/> Communications House Cork Road, Waterford City lgrif...@redhat.com M: +353877545162 IM: lgriffin @redhatjobs <https://twitter.com/redhatjobs> redhatjobs <https://www.facebook.com/redhatjobs> @redhatjobs <https://instagram.com/redhatjobs> <https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
