On Saturday, April 11, 2020 8:58:48 AM EDT John Reiser wrote: > On 4/11/20 4:38 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Steve Grubb wrote: > >> readelf -s $f 2>/dev/null | grep FUNC | egrep > >> 'seccomp_rule_add|seccomp' > > > > Since seccomp is a substring of seccomp_rule_add, it is pointless to > > grep for both. > > Yes, the output is the same. But the documentation is not as explicit. > A comment might be helpful: > ... | grep seccomp # also covers seccomp_rule_add
Precisely. The grep is to explicitly document there are 2 ways you can get into this. Direct use of the syscall, and use of libseccomp. There is a comment above explaining this, at least in my script.. -Steve _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
