On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 14:16, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:49:41AM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> >    There is also an historical taste to write in house applications for
> >    things that don't really seems critical to the Fedora Project, for
> example
> >    do we really need a custom calendar application ? or election
> application
> >    ? It seems that every time we have a problem the solution is let's
> write
> >    something to solve that problem, instead of trying to find a
> compromise
> >    and reuse existing solutions.
>
> Could please stop this?
>

> The continuous theme of "we're building things because we like it" is
> unfair to
> all the people who have been involved in the infrastructure at some point
> in the
> past.
> It is assuming that there was no reasons, that they did not do their
> research,
> that they didn't think it through.
>
> The requirements for applications 3 years ago were vastly different from
> what
> they are today.
> If you don't know the historical reasons for an app, there are a number of
> people around who can answer them, but please let's stop assuming things
> which
> are at the end of the day insulting and demotivating for the people who
> were
> involved then and are still now.
>
> This goes for fedocal, for pagure, for anitya. I've seen this question
> come up
> often enough (here and elsewhere): "Why aren't we using libraries.io
> instead of
> anytia?"
> Well, the simple reason is: because libraries.io *did* *not* *exist* when
> anitya
> was created. So maybe we are not the bad ones that didn't do their
> research.
>
>
> I am not saying that we can't re-evaluate these decision and see if they
> still
> make sense, but please, please, can we stop assuming the worst?
>
>
I apologize if that came down that way but this is exactly what I was
trying to say at the end of my email (see below since it was cut here) . I
am 100% sure that decision taken in the past were the best decision at that
time and I am honestly not in position to judge or to say anything about
it.

"
Finally, I would like to make clear that I am not blaming anyone, and that
decisions made in the past, I am sure were taken with the best intentions.
But I think it is also important to recognize that it is legitimate to
question these decisions today as something that made sense 10 years ago or
5 years ago might not make sense in today's context.
"

>
> >    Now when the CPE team goes and ask for more people because we struggle
> >    with current situation, I can only guess that these non critical
> >    applications are mentioned. If I was putting my own money to sponsor a
> >    team to help building a Linux distribution I would be asking why do we
> >    have to develop a calendar application or why do we need a custom git
> >    forge.
>
> Here as well, what you believe CPE is meant to be is immensely different
> than
> what the Fedora Infrastructure (Fedora Engineering) team was just a few
> years
> ago.
> So asking these questions and taking this angle may make sense with the new
> vision but you would have a much different picture if you were looking at
> them
> from the old vision, or the one before that, or the next one.
>
> Let's be aware that Fedora Infra's job hasn't been "Building a linux
> distro"
> since it's inception, for a long time its goal was much closer to
> "building and
> supporting the *community* that builds the linux distro".
> If you use this mission statement, you can a much different look at badges,
> elections or calendaring.
>

Yeah again agree with that, and I think this is what I was trying to say by
mentioning that we should look at these with today's context in mind. Again
sorry if I failed to express that point clearly.


>
>
>
> Piere
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to