On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 9:00 AM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 30. 03. 20 14:13, Neal Gompa wrote: > > And unlike Alioth, we have*serious* > > integration across the board with Pagure, and a good chunk of it is > > not possible to implement in GitLab. Features we have in here were > > designed to meet the needs of Fedorans that we will be forced to give > > up. > > I want to stress out that recently we even got more of it. Several years after > the PackageDB sunset, we are finally getting to a matching packager > experience. > > (For example with the Bugzilla default assignee or the unorphan/unretire > buttons.) > > Is this going to be possible with GitLab? Will CPE implement this before we > switch, or will GitLab be dumped on us and we will do toothless FESCo approved > statements, such as "Missing Pagure features should be re-implemented in > GitLab"? What measures will be taken to prevent yet another "open a releng > ticket and a human will do this while we automate stuff" era? >
And for what it's worth, the only remaining feature gap from PackageDB is in the process of being implemented in Pagure (per branch ACLs): https://pagure.io/pagure/pull-request/4786 Once that's done, we'll have *total* parity with the previous packager experience. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
