On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 7:02 AM Leigh Griffin <lgrif...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> I was really looking forward to reading what >> Neal (as he's doing now) and others had to say about the requirements >> *before* any decision was taken, and how each tool covers them or not, >> and what kind of effort would require to cover it in the latter case. >> This is *very* disappointing. > > I'm sorry this is disappointing but even reading the analysis by Neal it is > looking at the merit of the requirement and not looking at the fact that it > is valuable to somebody. Each stakeholder group had their own means to > discuss and debate the merits and had them rolled into CPE who in turn > analysed them and published the full story list.
I'm not bothering with the other aspects because there's no point. You *already* decided. Why should I evaluate the merits of the requirements when you've already decided they mattered enough to use them for deciding for GitLab? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
