So, checking after some days: Is there anything left for me to do about Anaconda quick docs? I'm not entirely sure, sorry...
Best, V+ On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:17 PM Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2020-03-13 at 17:37 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 08:55:16AM +0000, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > I honestly don't know. These were converted along with a bunch of other > > > wiki pages when the quick-docs were initially populated. I'll remove > > > them from the quick-docs now. > > > > For context: I made the initial list of quick docs from the most popular > > pages which seemed user-focused on the wiki. So that's how this got > there. > > > > > No, the wiki isn't going away but it is meant to be more of a scratch > > > pad for contributors now. Relatively static information is slowly being > > > moved to the docs. This includes user-facing documentation, and other > > > bits like SOP documents for various teams. For example: > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/engineering/ > > > > +1 > > > > A few years ago, Mo Duffy and I identified something like two dozen > totally > > different ways in which the project uses the wiki, from docs to policies > to > > scratch pads to meet notes to QA test matrices to user pages to I don't > even > > remember what now but I am not making up the number. > > > > Having this all together results in a poor user experience for people who > > want to read current and authoritative docs without being one click away > > from what's basically very perplexing deep-knowledge territory. So, we > > decided to create a separated docs site. > > However, now we've started moving things like policies onto that docs > site. I also feel it bears pointing out that you can get from the docs > site to the wiki, or from the wiki from the docs site, or from either > of those things to absolutely anywhere else on the internet, with "one > click" :) > > I know everyone knows I'm the #1 Wiki Fan, but I really don't grok a > lot of the justification for it being Bad. The justification I *can* > get behind is that it's a PITA to maintain, and for that I apologize to > smooge whenever I remember to ;). But I never really quite got this "oh > it's bad to have different things in one site" argument. Why is it bad? > What's the practical difference between them being there and them being > on different sites, if we still link between them and they're all > "Fedora"? > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Vladimír Slávik <vsla...@redhat.com> Software Engineer, Platform Engineering Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
