On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 18:07 +0100, jeandet wrote:
> Hello, 
> 
> I did an upgrade last week, with:
> sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=32
> Except for modules everything was ok on my laptop, but I got some
> issues on my desktop.
> On my laptop, from fc32 running: 
> sudo dnf module reset '*'
> sudo dnf --releasever=32 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f32 \
>     --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \
>     distro-sync
> did solve the modules warnings.
> 
> 
> On my desktop:
> 
> "/dev/disk/by-uuid" wasn't and still isn't populated with soft raid
> volumes, I had to change fstab to point to /dev/mdXXXpX to mount my
> home and other needed folders. From cockpit it also says "Unrecognized
> Data" for all my mdraid partitions.
> 
> I didn't have time to investigate more, so I jump into this mail to ask
> against which package should I report a bug? I have no idea who fills
> "/dev/disk/by-uuid".

systemd (well, udev, which is part of systemd these days). It should be
done by /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60-persistent-storage.rules , which is
part of systemd-udev. I wonder if it's possibly an issue that that runs
before /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/65-md-incremental.rules , but I'm just
guessing there...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to