On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 07:42:45AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:29:47AM +0100, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > There seem to be 2 related problems:
> > 1) Only the image on docker.io doesn't work. If you use
> > registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide, it works as expected.
> 
> Yeah, that's ... concerning. They should be identical.

nope... we can update our registry every rawhide compose. 
In order to update docker.io, someone has to file a PR, sign stuff and
wait for them to merge it. It's not automated and it's sometimes slow. 

So, docker.io could be out of date a fair bit...

> > 2) Fedora infra is unreliable. When the image from
> > registry.fedoraproject.org cannot be downloaded, there's a fallback
> > to docker.io which contains a different image. Running the command
> > several times in a row produces "random" results:
> 
> I believe the plan is to migrate to using quay.io now that that's open
> source.

Yeah, ideally, but we need them to support multi-arch and flatpaks. ;) 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to