On Tue, 2020-01-28 at 09:03 +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > If you want to go even further with this idea, then it could even be > possible we allow packages into Fedora without any review. They > would > start in the outermost stream in a "there be dragons" repository that > only the foolhardy would enable, but as their quality improved they > would *automatically* migrate into the mainstream.
We would need to at least have license review. Though automation can help with licensing, there are weird things sometimes that only a human could detect, like this[0]: https://github.com/szymach/c-pchart/issues/35 I do think we could automate a lot of the other elements of review though, and I agree that it would be helpful. Having a bot at least check for the obvious licence problems would still be helpful, but a bot that approves a package license still needs to be double checked by a human, in my opinion. The bot would be helpful in catching negatives (no license, or unacceptable license, etc.) [0] Thanks to Remi for catching it in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1425275 - I hadn't even noticed it myself!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
