On 1/25/20 9:25 PM, Bill Chatfield via devel wrote:
I think that by applying basic engineering techniques like user testing we can
weed out ideologies that don't provide any value to users. Do the testing and
let the results decide.The principles of ISO 9000 can be applied to improve
products. There are also metrics that can measure how good a user interface is,
like how many clicks does it take to perform a specific task. If these kinds of
techniques were being applied to Gnome, we'd be able to more impartially
measure how good Gnome is and also improve it. We'd be able to make more
informed decisions and get better results. And if the Gnome guys actually had
information like this, they'd be forced to deal with it. Maybe they'd be forced
to admit that they care more about their ideology than helping their users be
more productive. Or maybe the results would support the Gnome ideology. Until
someone takes a scientific/engineering approach to measuring it, the issue
can't really be resolved.
My problem with Gnome is that they just do whatever they feel like instead of
applying well-established engineering or software engineering quality processes.
Except that they have actually done user testing and metrics like you're
suggesting. Maybe you personally don't like their choices, but many
others do.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
