Den mån 16 dec. 2019 kl 18:42 skrev Adam Williamson < adamw...@fedoraproject.org>:
> > > Sometimes someone will propose that we've crossed the line when we > haven't, and usually we realize this and the proposal fails (excellent > example: the recentish "x86-64 micro-architecture update" proposal, > which met such universal raspberries it's probably not coming back for > a long time). It's possible that sometimes we get this call wrong, > we're only human. But it's wrong to suggest that decisions about what > we can and can't maintain, test and support are made for "no real > reason" or (as you suggested elsewhere) "arbitrarily". They aren't. > -- Thank you for a very informative and detailed post! /Andreas > > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
