On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 01:23:09PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 15. 11. 19 v 10:21 Victor Stinner napsal(a): > > I'm not sure if we need a Fedora change just for a compiler flag. Again, > > the only drawback is that we will no longer be able to override a symbol > > using LD_PRELOAD. Honestly, I never did that. I don't see any use case for > > that. But I used LD_PRELOAD on the libc multiple times to mock the system > > clock for example. > > > > If someone really needs LD_PRELOAD, it's quite easy to build a custom > > Python without -fno-semantic-interposition. > > Mock's Nosync plugin use LD_PRELOAD: > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/wiki/Feature-nosync
IIUC mock would not be affected by this change. The LD_PRELOAD limitation described applies to symbols that are in the libpython.so library. Those docs suggest mock is replacing the fsync() API in glibc with its LD_PRELOAD, so that should continue to work as normal. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
