Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I find the global exclusion of packages built but not shipped in an
> enabled module baffling and makes it very hard to provide
> updates/alternatives to those packages.
[snip]
> Beyond the horrible UX above, this seems so counter to the idea that we
> are building a platform upon which others can build and extend. In this
> case I can simply disable the rhn-tools module, but what if I wanted
> something else from that module?
Indeed, this is absolutely unacceptable.
> Hopefully the UX is better in Fedora (I haven't tested), but I believe the
> exclusion property remains.
As far as I know, Fedora has exactly the same broken implementation.
For Fedora, this issue is quite easy to fix though: modules in Fedora should
not be allowed to build but not ship packages to begin with!
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
