Il giorno mer, 06/11/2019 alle 08.52 +0100, Franta Hanzlík ha scritto: > If I can speak for myself and for the Linux people I know, nobody > needs a FreeIPA, and many need a Samba AD DC. And of course they want > a stable solution if possible. > > The current situation leads to either choosing a different > distribution > (the simplest solution), or compiling a Samba with Heimdal Kerberos > themselves; perhaps someone chooses a commercial solution also (which > is of course with Heimdal Kerberos). > > I am not saying that the FreeIPA is useless or has no users, but in > my > opinion the chosen attitude to the Samba AD DC was perhaps the worst > possible and IMO at least frustrated a lot of users (including me). > > For me, thanks to Nico Kadel-Garcia, for his work to make stable as > possible Samba AD DC in Fedora/Centos.
Thank Franta, this is exactly also my opinion, and me too thank to Kadel-Garcia for his work. Waiting for MIT kerberos to become stable and supported from samba team, a simple solution is insert into official samba.spec, a flag for easily rebuild it with heimdal kerberos, without substitute or modify the .spec file. Something like this: $ rpmbuild --rebuild --with heimdal .... samba-xxxx.src.rpm Can the Fedora samba maintainers do that? Thank -- Dario Lesca (inviato dal mio Linux Fedora 31 Workstation) _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
