On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:00 PM Pavel Cahyna <pcah...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 11:31:02AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > I would like to ask again if anyone who works at RedHat can check on
> > Pavel's status.  It would be good to know if he is not available until
> > <DATE>, or if he is too busy to pay attention to mpfr.  Thank you.
>
> Hi, sorry for the delayed reply. I will not be able to look into it
> before Monday.

[Nearly 2 months later]

I need some advice on how to proceed.  I am ready to move the mpfr 4
change forward, but the 2 lines above are the only communication I've
ever had from the package owner.  There is already a change page here,
which could be reused with some minor edits:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/mpfr-4.0.0

And that change page links to an existing releng issue where releng
agreed that the only action required by them is management of a side
tag:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7247

I would like to revive/hijack those to get this moving again.  What
should I do about the maintainer, who is probably very busy with other
work?  Since gcc uses mpfr, the package is a critical one for Fedora.
If it is not inconsistent with RedHat's goals or policies, could I
perhaps step into a comaintainer role for mpfr?

Since this thread is so old, I will repeat that I have done successful
x86_64 mock builds of all dependent packages.  I've got the right
sequence of builds all worked out and ready to go.  There may be
problems on other arches; if so, I am ready to fix them.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  • Re: MPFR 4 Jerry James

Reply via email to