On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 09:54 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote: > Is it ok to modify /etc/os-release for re-branding purpose?
Hi Danishka Navin, Good question on a bad place. Adding Fedora devel list here, there could be someone who is able to answer you this question. Jirka > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 6:11 PM Vendula Poncova <vponc...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:29 PM Danishka Navin <danis...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 6:16 PM Vendula Poncova < > > > vponc...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 9:56 AM Danishka Navin < > > > > danis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Jirka, > > > > > > > > > > I used the following command but did't use --product and -- > > > > > version at all. > > > > > Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we > > > > > ignore both --product and --version? > > > > > > > > > > livecd-creator --verbose --config=hanthana-live- > > > > > workstation.ks --fslabel=h30 --cache=cache --tmpdir=tmp > > > > > > > > > > Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with > > > > > my custom configs. > > > > > I could not reproduce the issue. > > > > > > > > > > I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the > > > > > /etc/os-release file. > > > > > > > > > > REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora" > > > > > REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Btw, there is a new issue occurred. > > > > > As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of > > > > > redhat-release file. > > > > > I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvT4nf.png > > > > > > > > > > Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release > > > > > file. > > > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvSiU5.png > > > > > > > > > > If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit. > > > > > When using "Hanthana 30" > > > > > > > > > > https://pasteboard.co/IvvTyBT.png > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anaconda reads the product name and the product version from > > /etc/system-release on Live ISO or from the .buildstamp file in > > network installations. See my comment about the .buildstamp file > > below. I think that all these problems are related. > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 1:06 PM <jkone...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > You have probably used bad parameters when you were > > > > > > invoking lorax. You have to use correct --product and -- > > > > > > version parameters otherwise we will be handling your ISO > > > > > > as Rawhide. > > > > > > Could you please tell us what command did you used to > > > > > > create your ISO? > > > > > > Regards,Jirka > > > > > > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote: > > > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO, > > > > > > > "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right hand > > > > > > > side of anaconda GUI. > > > > > > > May I know what could cause this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > for Live ISO, there is a little crazy logic that sets up the > > > > flag for a final release: > > > > https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/blob/master/data/liveinst/liveinst#L93 > > > > > > > > Basically, it is determined by a version of a package that > > > > provides system-release, so I would check that. > > > > > > > > What is the output of these commands, when you run them on your > > > > ISO? > > > > > > > > > > > > rpm -q --whatprovides system-release > > > > rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release > > > > > > $ rpm -q --whatprovides system-release > > > fedora-release-workstation-30-900.noarch > > > $ rpm -q --qf '%{Release}' --whatprovides system-release > > > 900[ > > > > > > > > > > It seems to be correct. The liveinst script should set the > > environment variable ANACONDA_ISFINAL to True before Anaconda is > > started. > > Network installations use the IsFinal attribute of the .buildstamp > > file to determine the value of the flag, but Live ISO shouldn't > > have this file and should use ANACONDA_ISFINAL instead. The path to > > the .buildstamp file can be /.buildstamp, /tmp/product/.buildstamp > > or set by the environment variable PRODBUILDPATH. Could you check > > that these files do not exist on your ISO? > > Otherwise, I would recommend to report a bug at > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ and attach the Anaconda logs from the > > installation. > > > > > > > > > Vendy > > > > > > > > > > > both os-release and redhat-release updated and I can see > > > > > > > given values. > > > > > > > both fedora and fedora-update repos used during the ISO > > > > > > > build along with few 3rd party repos. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Danishka Navin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________Anaconda- > > > > > > > devel-list mailing listanaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > > > > > > > > > > > > anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Danishka Navin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > > > > > > > > > > anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com > > > > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > > > > > > > > anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com > > > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Danishka Navin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > > > > > > anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com > > > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > > > > anaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list > > > _______________________________________________Anaconda-devel-list > mailing listanaconda-devel-l...@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
