Dne 15. 08. 19 v 14:40 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > > Dne 15. 08. 19 v 13:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a): >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 12:42:02 PM >>> Subject: Re: Let's revisit the FTBFS policy >>> >>> On 15. 08. 19 12:06, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>>> At the end, if somebody cares about such cases, it should not be hard to >>>> discover and act upon them, i.e. bugging the maintainer, fixing them, >>>> taking over the maintenance etc. >>> This part is problematic. Because it requires human action that can be seen >>> as >>> toxic by some. >> Only if they're present to notice. In the end, they're late and it was fixed >> for them, or at least someone cares for their work, so they should be... >> grateful? >> >>> > According to compose report from 20190811 [1], I guess it was ~570 >>> > packages. How many of them had associated FTBFS BZs in "ASSIGNED" state >>> > and for which version of Fedora? This would be interesting statistics to >>> > know. My guess is that it was 100 BZs at most, but probably much lower >>> > number. >>> >>> "for which version of Fedora" doesn't apply really. Most of the bugs were >>> just >>> "rawhide" since the latest rawhide -> 30 only happened partially. >>> >>> The status data should be visible in Bugzilla, however no idea how to query >>> them >>> grammatically: >>> >>> - get CLOSED EOL bugzillas blocking the F30FTBFS tracker >> This should be it: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1674516&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=CLOSED&list_id=10414793&query_format=advanced&resolution=EOL > > > So this lists 656 components for F30. > > There are 16 components for F29: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1602938&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=CLOSED&list_id=10415022&query_format=advanced&resolution=EOL > > > >>> - fetch their previous state >>> (this is visible in the bug, but no idea how to query it) >> Sorry, I have no idea for this one. >> > > Ah, you beat me to do this: > > > F30 - 41 components: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1674516&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=bug_status&f2=OP&list_id=10414961&o1=changedfrom&query_format=advanced&resolution=EOL&v1=ASSIGNED > > > F29 - 2 components: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1602938&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=bug_status&f2=OP&list_id=10414961&o1=changedfrom&query_format=advanced&resolution=EOL&v1=ASSIGNED > > > F28 - 25 components: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1555378&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=CLOSED&f1=bug_status&f2=OP&list_id=10414961&o1=changedfrom&query_format=advanced&resolution=EOL&v1=ASSIGNED > > > Interestingly enough, some people who complains the most about the > process are too busy to even switch the component to assigned ... >
Checking more of the tickets, I want to apologize for the last remark, which was not necessary. Vít > > Vít > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
