On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 11:29 -0700, Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 08:44:24PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > What is the point of this? I am probably missing something obvious.. > > I think this was because getting good coverage data from anaconda > without actually booting the installer iso wasn't possible. atodorov may > be able to provide more context.
was this possibly to do with the kickstart-tests effort - an attempt to figure out the code coverage of those tests? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
